Wound Dressing Cost Benefit Analysis

For health care professionals involved in wound management, achieving complete healing goals can be a long and costly process. Wound care involves a number of direct and indirect costs. It is difficult to compare wound care costs because (i) wound care costs are often confused with dressing costs, (ii) treatment outcomes are not standardized, (iii) different treatments do not have the same efficacy, and (iv) issues pertaining to quality of life are not considered in determining costs.

To evaluate the cost effectiveness of a treatment method, cost should be measured in terms of cost per unit outcome (Phillips, 1996). An analysis of collagen wound dressings and conventional wound care products illustrate how collagen dressings may decrease total treatment costs based upon assumptions of healing time and expenditures of wound care resources.

Wound Care Costs

The cost of treatment of pressure ulcers has been reported from $5,000 to $60,000 depending on the stage of ulcer and patient condition (Baker, 1996; Carroll, 1993; Carter, 1996; Olson, 1996). Only 70 percent of pressure ulcers heal in the first 12 months (Mian, et al., 1991). In one hospital, pressure ulcers accounted for 62 percent of its patient readmission cases.

Diabetic and other chronic wounds may take years to heal or may not heal at all (American Diabetes Association, 1996; Palmieri, 1992). According to the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), between 1989 and 1992, an average of 54,000 diabetes-related amputations were performed in the United States (NIDDK, 1995). Diabetic complications account for approximately 50 percent of all non-traumatic amputations in the Unites States (NIDDK, 1995). Costs for diabetic patients treated with amputation were $43,000 for minor amputation and $65,000 for major amputation (Apelqvist, et al., 1995). In cases of diabetic foot ulcers, costs could range from approximately $22,000 to $36,000 depending on the method used (Bentkover & Champion, 1993).

In the United States, the average cost of treating one leg ulcer is about $40,000 per year (Phillips, 1994). In cases of burns covering 30 percent of body surface, estimated costs range between $37,000 and $41,000 (Lofts, 1991). In 1992, hospital emergency room (ER) departments reported 34 million visits that were considered injury-related and require wound treatment. Approximately $9.8 billion was spent on injury-related treatment in ERs (Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, 1995). In another study, 50 percent of the healed venous stasis ulcers recurred within three months of discharge and two-thirds within in one year (Morris, et al., 1994).

© BioCore Medical Technologies, Inc. 1996

A Model for Cost, Chronic Wounds, and Wound Care

Healing time can range from a few weeks to a few months depending on the size and type of wound. Wound treatment involves many direct and indirect costs. According to the International Committee on Wound Management (ICWM), wound dressings comprise only 10 percent to 15 percent of the total direct treatment cost (1994). In contrast, a significant percentage of total cost is attributed to care provider salary and staff expenses (ICWM, 1994). As a result, dressings that reduce healing time to closure may translate into reduced cost of care.

Alternative approaches to wound care such as growth factors and artificial skin have projected greater efficacy than traditional dressings with significantly greater costs. Public domain information indicates average treatment costs for alternative approaches range from $10,000 30,000 in the treatment of chronic wounds (Sturza Medical Investment, 1996). Extrapolation of public domain data projects the average costs of these approaches to be approximately $16,500. By these estimates, BioCore's Kollagen™ products would be approximately one-fourth of the projected cost of alternative treatments and one-third of the cost of traditional methods on an average chronic wound.

Table 1: Chronic Wound Cost Analysis*
  Kollagen Traditional Dressing Other Technologies
Treatment Time 60 days 180 days 90 days
Total Product Costs $960 $2,100 $16,500
Secondary Dressing Costs $400 0 Information not available
Support Costs $4,000 $12,000 $6,000
Total Costs $5,360 $14,100 $22,500
Wound Closure Rate 95% 43% 50-60%

Sources: BioCore Medical Technologies, Inc., Bentkover, & Champion, 1995 and Sturza Medical Investment Letter (www.westergaard.com:8080/Pegaus/org.html)
  • KolIogen cost indications: Costs based on Medicare reimbursement rates ($32 per gram), BioCore utilization protocols, assumption of closure rates based on field utilization data, and cross treatment assumptions.
  • Traditional dressing cost indications: Average dressing costs of $330 a month (field data closure and efficacy rates; and cross treatment assumptions)
  • Alternative Technology cost indications: Public domain manufacturer cost, efficacy and closure rate estimates and cross treatment assumptions. Manufacturers estimates are used because of lack of FDA clearance for market utilization and lack of field data. Secondary dressing costs are indicated, however, not estimated for this table because a lack of data regarding utilization required
  • Cross treatment cost assumptions: Secondary dressing costs of $200 a month; support treatment costs of $2,000 a month (Note: patch technology support treatment costs are likely to be much greater due to clinical expertise required to monitor the wound). Support Costs: Cost associated with care delivered during the healing process.
  • Treatment Time: In the context of this chart treatment time has been taken from the average period of treatment to closure of a wound using the technologies in the chart and is used for comparative purposes only The time to healing of any individual wound is subject to many variables and may be markedly longer or shorter than that used in this chart.

A Model for Cost, Surgical and Traumatic Wounds, and Wound Care

Preliminary field utilization data demonstrates promising results while using Kollagen™ products on traumatic and surgical wounds. In a study of standard surgical wounds, a one-time application of Kollagen dressings resulted in wound closure in eight days, in comparison to 12 days to closure in the positive control group. Table II is an extrapolation of the costs associated with the experimental (Kollagen™) and control (traditional) groups.

Table II: Surgical and Traumatic Wound Treatment Cost Analysis
  Kollagen Xeroform®
Dressing Treatment Time to Closure 8 days 12 days
Kollagen Costs $26 0
Support Costs $800 $1200
Xeroform® Costs $48 j $72
Total Costs $874 $1272

Sources: BioCore Medical Technologies, Inc. and Griswold, 1995
  • Kollagen cost indications: Assumption of wound closure in 8 days; one time application of product utilizing company treatment protocols; and utilization of Xeroform dressing daily.
  • Xeroform cost indications: Assumption of wound closure in 12 days and $6 per day dressing costs. Support cost assumptions: Cost assumption of $l0O per day for treatment. This number may be high for Kollagen group since daily dressing change is not required.

Collagen Dressings and Reduced Wound Care Costs

The cost of total wound care using collagen products may also be reduced because collagen products require fewer dressing changes. As a result, patients need less nursing care and office visits (Baxter & Bookout, 1994). For example, studies report that Kollagen™ dressings needed to be changed an average of once a day and yielded better results than conventional dressings (Kollenberg, 1995, 1996). In contrast, traditional dressings are changed more frequently (Trelease, 1986). Consequently, the decrease in nursing care needed for Kollagen dressings may significantly decrease the overall care costs.

Summary

Exact cost studies on the use of collagen wound dressings are in process. The models presented above illustrate that collagen dressings may decrease treatment costs through assumptions of reduced treatment time and required nursing. Consequently, both direct and indirect treatment costs should decrease significantly in most cases.

As stated earlier, calculating cost effectiveness for wound care is a difficult process because few standards exist. Accounting for indirect costs associated with patient quality of life issues (lost days from work, etc.) can be even more complex to calculate. Medical professionals should consider psychological impacts such as loss of independence, feeling of fear, lack of social contact and loss of self-confidence (ICWM, 1994). Reduced healing time and decreased need for medical care allow patients to enjoy a better quality of life and return to normal activities.

References

  1. American Diabetes Association (ADA). Diabetes: 1996 Vital Statistics. Alexandria, Virginia: 1996.
  2. Apelqvist, 1., Ragnarson-Tennall, G., Larason, J, Persson, U., Long-Term Costs for Foot Ulcers in Diabetic Patients in a Multidisciplinary Setting, Foot and Ankle Intl 1995;16(7):388-94
  3. Baker J. Medicaid Claims History of Florida Long-Term Care Facility Residents Hospitalized for Pressure Ulcers. JWOCN 199623(I):23-25.
  4. Baxter CB, Bookout KR. Clinical Evaluations of Kollagen Products for Treatment of Various Chronic and Acute Wounds. Dallas, TX: Unpublished Manuscript.
  5. Bentkover JD, Champion AH. Economic Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Treatment for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Patients: Cost-Effectiveness of Platelet Release and Wound Care Clinics. Wounds 1993 ;5(4):207-2 15.
  6. Carroll P. Pressure Ulcers and Materiel Management: Cost-Effective Prevention and Care. Hospital Material Management Quarterly 1993; 1 5(2):38-49.
  7. Carter RB. Wound Treatment Cost with Collagen. Unpublished Manuscript.
  8. Centers for Disease Control, The Vital and Health Statistics of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Feb. 1, 1995;261:3-l1
  9. Griswold JA, Cepica T, Rossi L, et al. A Comparison of Xeroform and SkinTemp Dressings in the Healing of Skin Graft Donor Sites. Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation 1995; 16(2): 136-140.
  10. International Committee on Wound Management. Wound Management and Quality of Life in the Elderly. Wounds 1 994;6(3):94-100
  11. Kollenberg LO. A Podiatrist's Amazing Experience with Collagen Part I. Podiatry Today 1995 :49-62.
  12. Kollenberg LO. A Podiatrist's Amazing Experience with Collagen Part II. Podiatry Today 1996:51-54.
  13. Lofts JA. Cost Analysis of a Major Burn. New Zealand Medical Journal 1991;104:488-89
  14. MedStrat Inc. Wound and Burn Management 2000. 1989.
  15. Mian, Mian, Beghe: Lyophiized Type I Collagen and Chronic Leg Ulcers. International Journal of Tissue Reaction 1991; 12(5):275-269
  16. Moms EJ, Dowlen 5, CuIlen B. Early Clinical Experience with Topical Collagen in Vascular Wound Care. JWOCN 1994;21:247-250.
  17. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Home Page. http:I/www.niddk.nih.gov/DiabetesStatistics/DiabetesStatistics.html
  18. Olson B, Langemo D, Burd C, Hanson D, Hunter S. Cathcart-Silberberg T. Pressure Ulcer Incidence in an Acute Care Setting. JWOCN 1996;23:15-22
  19. Palmieri B. Heterologous Collagen in Wound Healing: A Clinical Study. International Journal of Tissue Reaction 1992;1421-25
  20. Phillips T, Stanton B, Provan A, Lew R. A Study of the Impact of Leg Ulcers on Quality of Life: Financial, Social, and Psychological Implications. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994;3 1:49-53.
  21. Sturza Medical Investment Letter ian., 16, 1996. Westergaard Research Home Page.
  22. Trelease C: A Cost-Effective Approach for Promoting Skin Healing. Nursing Economics, 1986;4(5)265-66

Previous Page Next Page
WoundHEAL.com
4820 Eubank Blvd. NE • Albuquerque, New Mexico 87111
Toll Free: (877) 592-9358 • Local: (505) 292-9358 • Fax: (505) 292-0700
info@WoundHEAL.com